Criteria — Check Each That Applies

R
Respiratory Rate ≥ 22/min
Tachypnea at or above 22 breaths per minute
+1 if yes
M
Altered Mentation (GCS < 15)
Any change in mental status from baseline; GCS below 15
+1 if yes
B
Systolic BP ≤ 100 mmHg
Hypotension — systolic blood pressure at or below 100
+1 if yes
🩺
Check criteria on the left
to calculate qSOFA score
⚕️ Limitations & Disclaimer: qSOFA is a screening tool only — it is not diagnostic for sepsis. Sensitivity is approximately 60–70%; a negative qSOFA does not rule out sepsis. Do not use qSOFA alone to exclude sepsis in a patient with clinical concern for infection. Always calculate the full SOFA score when qSOFA ≥ 2. This calculator is for educational use only and does not substitute for clinical judgment.

qSOFA Score Interpretation

⚠️ Sepsis-3 (2016): qSOFA ≥ 2 does not diagnose sepsis. It identifies patients at elevated risk who need urgent full SOFA assessment and organ dysfunction workup.
Score Risk Level Interpretation Recommended Action
0 Low Risk Not qSOFA-positive Assess for other causes; reassess if clinical status changes
1 Low Risk Not qSOFA-positive Reassess within 1–2 hours; monitor closely if infection suspected
2 qSOFA Positive ≥3× increased in-hospital mortality risk Full SOFA score; blood cultures + lactate; escalate therapy; consider ICU
3 qSOFA Positive Highest risk — all three criteria met Urgent ICU consultation; initiate Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle

About qSOFA

The qSOFA score (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) was introduced in the Sepsis-3 consensus definitions (Singer M et al., JAMA 2016;315(8):801–810) as a rapid bedside screening tool for adults with suspected infection who are outside the ICU. It was designed to replace the older SIRS criteria, which were considered insufficiently specific for identifying sepsis-related organ dysfunction.

qSOFA requires no laboratory values and takes under 30 seconds to calculate — making it ideal for emergency department, general ward, and prehospital assessment. A score ≥ 2 identifies patients at significantly elevated risk for in-hospital death, prolonged ICU stay, or need for acute resuscitation.

The Three Criteria Explained

qSOFA vs. SOFA vs. SIRS

The Sepsis-3 task force evaluated multiple scoring tools and found qSOFA had superior predictive validity for in-hospital mortality compared to SIRS criteria in non-ICU patients. The full SOFA score remains the reference standard for diagnosing sepsis (defined as acute SOFA increase of ≥2 points in the setting of suspected infection), but requires six organ-system measurements including laboratory values. qSOFA serves as the bedside triage step.

SIRS criteria (≥2 of: fever/hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, leukocytosis/leukopenia) are no longer recommended to define sepsis under Sepsis-3 — they are overly sensitive and not specific to infection-related organ dysfunction. A patient meeting SIRS criteria without qSOFA positivity should still receive clinical assessment, but qSOFA better identifies those with the highest mortality risk.

Clinical Integration: The Sepsis Workup

When qSOFA ≥ 2 in a patient with suspected infection, the following workup is generally indicated:

When qSOFA Has Limitations

qSOFA has known weaknesses in specific populations:

References

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287

Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762–774.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063–e1143.